|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Philatelic
Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Fake Errors
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Benjamin West. "Intaglio
black" omitted. (Scott No. 1553)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Normal
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Fake
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
This stamp was sold to an unsuspecting buyer as having "intaglio
black" omitted. In fact, the stamp was printed entirely by photogravure.
The inscription, purported to be omitted, was printed in light gray,
not black. Black intaglio ink is impossible to successfully
bleach or scrape off. The faker counted on this common knowledge
to deflect suspicion. He guessed, and guessed correctly, that
having described the stamp as intaglio omitted, no one would bother
to scrutinize it too carefully. The unlucky buyer of this "error,"
for which he paid a substantial price, subsequently wrote me to suggest
listing it in the Error Catalogue. I didn't even have to see
the stamp to know something was wrong -- the issue contains no intaglio
printing. Under magnification, the fakery became evident.
The faker carefully, with a light, deft touch, erased the gray inscription.
The moral to the story, examine color-omitted error stamps under magnification
for possible signs of tampering.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
©
Copyright 2010 and previous years by Stephen R. Datz. All rights reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||